Capital Broadcasting Company, et al. v. Mitchell, et al.

Six corporations that operated radio stations challenged the constitutionality of a tobacco control law that banned cigarette advertising on all federally regulated electronic communications media. Although the corporations argued that the ability to disseminate information is integral to the right to freedom of speech, the Court refused to extend full First Amendment protections to advertisements, holding that the advertising ban did not implicate the corporations' right to speak but affected only their monetary interests. The Court further held that the ban did not violate due process because rational bases existed for regulating advertising in broadcast media and in print media differently.  The dissent stated that the ban violated speech protections because it restricted the flow of truthful information to the public.

DOWNLOAD DOCUMENT

Capital Broadcasting Company, et al. v. Mitchell, et al., 333 F. Supp. 582, United States District Court for the District of Columbia (1971).

  • United States
  • Oct 14, 1971
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia

Parties

Plaintiff

  • Capital Broadcasting Company
  • Others

Defendant

  • John Mitchell, Attorney General of the United States
  • Thomas Flannery, United States Attorney for the District of Columbia

Third Party

  • National Association of Broadcasters

Legislation Cited

Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act (as amended), 15 USC §§ 1331 - 1341

Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act of 1969, 15 U.S. Code Section 1335

Related Documents

Type of Litigation

Tobacco Control Topics

Substantive Issues

Type of Tobacco Product

None