Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
The wife and son of the deceased brought an action against, Souza Cruz, a tobacco company, claiming that the company's misleading advertisement led the husband/father to the consumption of tobacco, which eventually caused his death. The lower court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and the defendant appealed, arguing that the plaintiffs claim did not apply to the victim, as he started smoking tobacco before the law prohibiting misleading advertisement and demanding disclosure of side effects came into force. The higher court, acknowledging the objectives of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and domestic tobacco laws with regards to tobacco advertisement, ruled in favor of the plaintiff and sentenced Souza Cruz to pay damages for the pain suffered by the plaintiffs.