Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
This was an appeal from the decision of a single judge dismissing an application by the Tobacco Institute of Australia (TIA) to have these proceedings struck out. The proceedings related to the publication of a newspaper advertisement by the TIA stating that "(T)here is little evidence and nothing which proves scientifically that cigarette smoking causes disease in non-smokers;" and"The London Times reported findings from the Institute of Cancer Research in Surrey, England ... that 'passive smoking' for life-long non-smokers causes no significant increase in the risk of lung cancer, bronchitis or heart disease ... The Institute's conclusions are based on a wealth of statistical detail from a study involving 12,000 people."
The plaintiff brought these proceedings against the TIA alleging that the advertisement was misleading and deceptive in contravention of the Trade Practices Act. The TIA sought to have the proceedings struck out as an abuse of process because it said the matter had already been fully investigated and determined by the Trade Practices Commission. Burchett J dismissed the TIA's arguments in the earlier decision (see: Re Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc v. Tobacco Institute of Australia Limited [1988] FCA 183 (7 June 1988)).
In this decision, the Full Court of the Federal Court upheld Burchett J's decision and dismissed the TIA's appeal with costs.
See further: Re Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc v. Tobacco Institute of Australia Limited [1991] FCA 17 (7 February 1991).