Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
This is the first in a series of decisions relating to an advertisement published by the Tobacco Institute of Australia (TIA). The advertisement, which ran in several newspapers on July 1, 1986, stated that "(T)here is little evidence and nothing which proves scientifically that cigarette smoking causes disease in non-smokers;" and "The London Times reported findings from the Institute of Cancer Research in Surrey, England ... that 'passive smoking' for life-long non-smokers causes no significant increase in the risk of lung cancer, bronchitis or heart disease ... The Institute's conclusions are based on a wealth of statistical detail from a study involving 12,000 people."
The plaintiff complained about the advertisement to the Trade Practices Commission (Commission) which initiated an investigation. Following negotiations between the Commission and the TIA, the TIA gave the Commission an undertaking not to re-publish the advertisement and to publish a corrective statement, in exchange for the Commission agreeing not to bring proceedings against it. However, the corrective statement did not address the broad claim about the effects of passive smoking; rather it was directed to a minor correction about the size of the study referred to in the original advertisement.
The plaintiff therefore commenced its own proceedings against the TIA alleging that the advertisement was misleading and deceptive in breach of the Trade Practices Act.
This was the hearing of the TIA's application to have the proceedings stayed on the ground that they were an abuse of process. The TIA claimed that the plaintiff did not have standing to bring the claim because the matter had already been fully investigated by the Commission.
Burchett J dismissed the TIA's application and awarded costs to the plaintiff, holding that there was nothing to prevent the plaintiff from bringing the proceedings.
The TIA subsequently appealed from this decision and lost - see: Re Tobacco Institute of Australia Limited v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc [1988] FCA 373 (21 October 1988).