Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
These proceedings relate to a newspaper advertisement published by the Tobacco Institute of Australia (TIA) on July 1, 1986, which stated that "(T)here is little evidence and nothing which proves scientifically that cigarette smoking causes disease in non-smokers;" and"The London Times reported findings from the Institute of Cancer Research in Surrey, England ... that 'passive smoking' for life-long non-smokers causes no significant increase in the risk of lung cancer, bronchitis or heart disease ... The Institute's conclusions are based on a wealth of statistical detail from a study involving 12,000 people."
The plaintiff sued the TIA alleging that the advertisement was misleading and deceptive in breach of s52 of the Trade Practices Act.
Morling J upheld the plaintiff's claim. Following a comprehensive review of the evidence, His Honour found that at the date of the advertisement there was compelling scientific evidence that cigarette smoking causes lung cancer in non-smokers, and therefore that the statement in the advertisement was erroneous when first made and continued to be so. He further found that the statement that there was little evidence and nothing which proves scientifically that cigarette smoke causes disease in non-smokers was demonstrably false in 1986 insofar as it applied to respiratory disease in children. Morling J also found that the statement was misleading and deceptive insofar as it applied to the disease of asthma.
Morling J decided that the plaintiff was entitled to injunctive relief but that an order requiring the TIA to publish corrective statements was inappropriate due to the length of time that had passed since the original advertisement.
The TIA appealed this decision unsuccessfully, although the Full Court set aside the injunctive relief and instead made declarations. (See, further: Re Tobacco Institute of Australia Limited v. Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc [1992] FCA 630 (17 December 1992); and Re Tobacco Institute of Australia Limited v. Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc [1993] FCA 83 (10 March 1993)).