Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
The plaintiff brought action against Souza Cruz, a tobacco company, seeking damages arising from misleading advertisement and information on tobacco products. Further, she argued that these advertisements led her husband to the consumption of tobacco which ultimately led to his death. The Public Prosecutors’ Office intervened in the case. The lower court dismissed the case based on absence of proof that tobacco consumption caused the diseases from which the plaintiff's husband died. The plaintiff then appealed to the higher court alleging that there was indeed a connection between tobacco use and the health conditions suffered by her husband and presented supporting evidence. The higher court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering Souza Cruz to pay moral damages.