Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
In 2021, Philip Morris France SAS (PMF) and Philip Morris Products SA (PMP) were convicted for IQOS’s illegal advertisement in France. PMF and PMP both appealed. In this June 25, 2024 decision, the Paris Court of Appeal upheld the lower court’s underlying conviction.
In this appeal, the PMF and PMP alleged the French Public Health Code’s prohibition on tobacco advertising was a disproportionate infringement on freedom of information and enterprise and impeded an individual’s right to protect their own health. PMF and PMP also re-submitted their trial positions that IQOS was not a “tobacco product” and therefore could be advertised in France.
The Court of Appeal held that IQOS was not a “tobacco product” but concluded the advertising ban still applied as IQOS encouraged the use of tobacco. Further, as IQOS’s sale was permitted and as the advertising ban allowed for limited exceptions, the limitations on rights were proportionate to the interest in protecting public health.
The court modified but affirmed the criminal court’s convictions. PMF was fined 500,000 EUR while PMP was fined 400,000 EUR. Civilly, PMF and PMP were ordered to pay the plaintiffs in the initial case, CNCT and DNF, 1,730,910 EUR in recognition of the harm which IQOS’s illegal advertising had caused to France’s anti-smoking initiatives.