Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
The National Committee on Tobacco Control (CNCT) alleged that VFG France engaged in unlawful advertising of tobacco products by advertising and selling a line of "Marlboro Classics” clothing in a store whose neon sign resembled the Marlboro logo. The lower court agreed and ordered defendants to pay a 20,000 Euro fine and 87,000 Euros in damages. VFG appealed, arguing that it should be permitted to sell its clothing line and that the prohibition on such sales violated their right to freedom of expression and other laws. The court of appeals upheld the lower court's order, ruling that the use of a neon sign resembling the Marlboro logo, as well as the liberal use of red, white and black lettering in the clothing line, constituted unlawful advertisement of tobacco products.