Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
An Austrian local administrative authority fined MM, a managing director of a tobacco wholesaler, €1,000 for supplying cigarette packets to a retailer bearing promotional terms such as “perfectly rounded” and “with slow curing” that violated provisions on labelling in Austria’s tobacco control law. The Regional Administrative Court annulled the fine, reasoning that the supply to a retail outlet did not constitute “placing on the market” under the tobacco control law and the EU Tobacco Products Directive (TPD). However, upon appeal, the Austrian Supreme Administrative Court referred the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for further clarification on what “placing on the market” meant.
The CJEU ruled that the obligation imposed on Member States by Article 23(2) of the TPD – to prevent the placing on the market of non-compliant tobacco products – extends beyond the sale by retail outlets to consumers. Specifically, the Court clarified that this obligation also applies at earlier stages of the supply chain, including the supply from a wholesaler to a retail outlet. The CJEU held that limiting enforcement to retail sales would undermine the directive’s objective of ensuring high public health protection and effective compliance across the entire supply chain. The judgment emphasized that Member States must conduct enforcement and surveillance at all stages – from manufacture to retail – to prevent non-compliant products from becoming accessible to consumers.