UAB Litrades Didmena v State Consumer Rights Protection Service
UAB Litrades Didmena v State Consumer Rights Protection Service, Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, Case No. eA-582-463/2024.
- Lithuania
- Jun 12, 2024
- Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania
On April 7, 2022, the State Consumer Rights Protection Service fined UAB Litrades Didmena, a wholesale e-cigarette distributor, 750 euros for violating the labelling and packaging laws. Among other things, the company listed the “nicotine salt” content on e-cigarette packaging, but not “nicotine” content, as was required by the law. This risked misleading consumers. Further, the company noted the e-cigarette's “Whoop Wild Berries” flavour on the packaging despite listing flavouring on e-cigarette packaging being prohibited by law.
On May 2, 2023, the company appealed to the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court. In their appeal the company submitted that they only sold their e-cigarettes in Lithuania after a successful customs inspection and after having obtained a permit. The company therefore alleged that the violations were actually the result of an incomplete and negligent customs inspection. The Regional Court disagreed, concluding that a customs inspection did not mean a product met all requirements for retail sale. The Regional Court dismissed the appeal.
The company then appealed to the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania where it submitted that the Regional Administrative Court did not reasonably consider the company’s arguments and evidence. The Supreme Court of Lithuania disagreed. It concluded that the “nicotine salt” label violated the law and could mislead consumers and that the listing of “Whoop Wild Berries” flavour also violated the law.