Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
The Austrian Administrative Court addressed an appeal by J G, the managing director of J GmbH, against a penalty imposed for violating the Tobacco and Non-Smokers Protection Act (TNRSG) of 1995. The violation concerned the advertising of electronic cigarettes and related products on the company’s website, which included promotional language such as “the ingenious vaping lounge” and “a new concept,” alongside product recommendations and pricing. A fine of €1,400 was imposed.
Part of the appeal was declared inadmissible for procedural reasons. The remainder of the appeal was dismissed as unfounded, with the court reaffirming that the TNRSG prohibits online advertising of tobacco-related products, even when legally sold. It held that the website content constituted prohibited advertising, as it went beyond a mere listing of products and prices. The court emphasized that "advertising" under the TNRSG includes any form of commercial communication that directly or indirectly promotes sales and clarified that exceptions to the ban—such as those applicable to specialized retail stores—do not apply to online platforms.