Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
The plaintiff brought action against Souza Cruz, a tobacco company, seeking damages for the death of her spouse, which was allegedly caused by the consumption of tobacco products manufactured by Souza Cruz. She argued that her spouse was induced to consume tobacco by Souza Cruz's misleading advertisements, which were not regulated at the time her spouse started consuming tobacco. The lower court dismissed the action on the grounds that there was no connection between the spouse’s death and the consumption of tobacco. The plaintiff then appealed to the higher court, which partially reversed the decision and granted the plaintiff damages. The defendant filed a "request for reconsideration” and the Court annulled the appeals court decision and granted the defendant the right to produce evidence.