Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
Guatemala sued the tobacco industry for damages related to the cost of providing medical care for its citizens due to smoking-related illnesses. Guatemala claimed that it failed to adequately regulate the use of tobacco by its citizens because of the tobacco industry’s misrepresentations and anticompetitive behavior regarding the health impacts of tobacco. The court dismissed Guatemala’s case because any injury to Guatemala was too remote to have been directly caused by the tobacco industry. Instead, individual Guatemalan citizens could sue the tobacco industry because of their direct injuries caused by smoking.