"Plaintiff’s counsel’s description that “Lynn French wakes each day to a sea of painful and debilitating maladies caused by cigarettes smoke” is, most respectfully, his own invention. He adds to the symptoms actually reported by the plaintiff and her doctor, as described above, those discussed by other witnesses as possible symptoms and complications of sinusitis, such as life threatening orbital abscesses and asthma. There was no evidence that the plaintiff had such symptoms, was likely to develop them, or was even fearful of developing them. In view of the evidence of the plaintiff’s pain and suffering, the award of 5.5 million dollars is, indeed, shocking. Plaintiff’s counsel attempts to equate the condition of Ms. French to the condition of plaintiffs in cases he claims present “comparable injuries” and in which the courts have found that a remittitur of multimillion dollar awards was improper. The case plaintiff cites as “most on point” is Oakes v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 546 So. 2d 427 (3d DCA 1989). If the only evidence in Oakes, were as described in plaintiff’s submission, that the plaintiff suffered from “shortness of breath and coughing spells,” certainly a remittitur of the award of 2.5 million dollars would have been upheld on appeal. However, as set forth in the Third District’s opinion, the evidence of Mr. Oakes’ suffering was overwhelming. It is not remotely comparable to the evidence in our case."