Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
A group of tobacco companies, growers, marketers, and dealers challenged the issuance of a report by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifying environmental tobacco smoke as a known human carcinogen. The court ruled that the lawsuit against the EPA could continue because the EPA report constituted a final agency action, which was reviewable by the court. The court said that a ruling on the claim by tobacco companies that the EPA had violated their right to due process should be deferred until later in the case when more facts have been presented.