Flamingo Paradise Gaming, LLC, et al. v. Chanos, et al.
Flamingo Paradise Gaming, LLC, et al. v. Chanos, et al., 217 P.3d 546, Supreme Court of Nevada (2009).
- United States
- Sep 24, 2009
- Supreme Court of Nevada
Flamingo Paradise Gaming, LLC, et al. v. Chanos, et al., 217 P.3d 546, Supreme Court of Nevada (2009).
Various business entities challenged the facial constitutionality of the Nevada Clean Indoor Air Act's regulations of smoking in most indoor public places, which mandated both civil and criminal penalties for violations of the regulations. The court affirmed the lower court's holding that the statute violated due process vagueness doctrine when considered as a criminal measure, finding that the statute failed to provide clear standards for enforcement. The court further affirmed that, as a civil measure severed from the criminal prohibitions, the statute comported with due process vagueness doctrine. The court additionally held that the statute's differing treatment of establishments holding various types of gaming licenses did not violate equal protection standards and that neither the statute's smoking prohibition nor the statute's requirement that no-smoking signs be posted on private premises constituted an unconstitutional taking of property.