Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
f6 Cigarettenfabrik (f6) is a manufacturer of heated tobacco inserts that are used with a battery-powered device to heat tobacco for consumption. Until December 31, 2021, these inserts were taxed like pipe tobacco in Germany. However, beginning January 1, 2022, an additional supplementary tax was applied to heated tobacco inserts (in addition to the excise tax duty). f6 challenged the supplementary tax’s legality because it differed from taxes for other smoking tobacco products and was inconsistent with EU Directives. The case was referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).
The CJEU found that member states can add taxes to excise goods (which includes heated tobacco) for specific purposes. The specific purpose, in this case, was to ensure that heated tobacco was taxed similarly to cigarettes and, therefore, deter nicotine-dependent consumers from replacing cigarettes with heated tobacco, which is also harmful to health. As such, the CJEU found that Germany’s law applying a supplementary tax to heated tobacco inserts was compatible with EU Directives.