Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
Sixty members of Parliament requested that the Constitutional Council strike down two provisions of the alcohol and tobacco control legislation, which concerned a prohibition on tobacco advertisements. The Council struck down the two provisions, finding that, while measures taken to protect the population's health are constitutionally protected in the preamble of the Constitution, the measures at issue were not properly balanced against the industry's right to property and freedom of enterprise as protected under the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. The Council stated that the legislation amounted to an "arbitrary and abusive" restriction of free enterprise and imposed excessive limitations on the right to property when assessed against the legitimate aim of protecting health.