Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
A group of nicotine-dependent cigarette smokers sued several tobacco companies and an industry trade group seeking various remedies under several legal theories spanning several states. The group alleged that the companies' fraudulently manipulated the nicotine content in their products to encourage addiction and failed to disclose the addictive nature of nicotine to consumers. Upon defendants' motion requesting class decertification, the Court of Appeals held that the trial court had abused its discretion when it certified the conditional class. The Court found, among other things, that the trial court failed to properly examine whether differences among state laws and whether the method of trying claims alleging fraud and addiction-as-injury precluded the possibility of common issues predominating the class. After determining that the class action mechanism employed here was not demonstrably superior to individual lawsuits, the Court ordered the trial court to dismiss the class complaint.