Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
On June 22, 2020, the Dutch Secretary for Health, Welfare & Sport announced a ban on e-cigarette flavors. The Ministerial Regulation that followed excluded 16 flavor additives from this ban. In essence, all flavors except tobacco were banned. The ban’s enforcement was to begin January 1, 2024.
British American Tobacco International Holdings and Nicoventures Holdings (collectively “BAT”) alleged that the ban disproportionately interfered with the free movement of goods (citing the TPD). BAT further alleged that the flavor ban did not contribute to public health because it would prevent smokers from quitting and encourage young people who used flavored e-cigarettes to switch to conventional cigarettes.
The Netherlands disagreed with BAT, noting that the flavor ban supported public health. The Netherlands provided evidence that established the harmful effects of e-cigarettes and the role of e-cigarettes as a gateway to other tobacco products.
The Hague District Court agreed with the Netherlands and noted that the Tobacco Products Directive allows Member States to regulate e-cigarette flavors. The Court held that the flavors ban was not contrary to the free movement of goods and was not contrary to the TPD objective of protecting public health.
On this basis, the court dismissed BAT’s claims and ordered BAT to pay the costs for the proceedings.