Aunestraja v. State of Tamil Nadu

The petitioner was arrested for possessing packets of “Cool Lip,” a tobacco pouch or snus consumed by placing the pouch between the cheek and the gum.  The petitioner filed for a bail plea to be released from custody and the Madras High Court issued this order in response. 

The Court found that there was a sudden increase in children using Cool Lip and it has a debilitating effect on children’s health and behavior.  Further, although the product is banned in Tamil Nadu, it was being smuggled in from bordering states.

To advance public health and protect children, the Court issued detailed instructions to the State and Central Governments, including:

  • Arresting offenders who sell tobacco products near schools
  • Implementing Tobacco Free Education Institution Guidelines
  • Forming a Tobacco Monitoring Committee in every school
  • Creating a toll-free number, application, or website to report the sale of tobacco pouches or snus
  • Using the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 to address tobacco pouches and snus
  • Implementing the Tamil Nadu Prohibition on Smoking and Spitting Act, 2003, a State-specific law that is more comprehensive than COTPA.

Aunestraja v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors (CRL OP(MD) No.14942 of 2024)

  • India
  • Oct 30, 2024
  • Madras High Court (Madurai Bench)
Download Document

Parties

Plaintiff Aunestraja

Defendant

  • State of Tamil Nadu
  • Union of India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare
  • The Secretary to Government, School Education Department
  • The Commissioner of Food Safety and Drug Administration in Tamil Nadu
  • Tejram Dharam Paul Pvt. Ltd.
  • Vidharath Industries Pvt. Ltd.
  • VRG Products Pvt. Ltd.

Legislation Cited

Related Documents

Type of Litigation

Tobacco Control Topics

Substantive Issues

Type of Tobacco Product

"Extreme emergency looms. There is a sudden spurt of children using Tobacco product more specifically a product named Cool Lip. Huge quantity of tobacco products are seized in State of Tamilnadu especially in and around the schools. Decision has to be made by this Court in at least 10 cases per day relating to grant of bail in these type of matters. This Court also exercises the jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with reference to Criminal matters. Repeatedly questions of addiction of school children to tobacco products arise. Since, percolation from other [neighbouring] states where the products are permitted to be sold is alleged, it required detailed consideration. This case is also one."