Limitations regarding the use of quotes
The quotes provided here reflect statements from a specific decision. Accordingly, the International Legal Consortium (ILC) cannot guarantee that an appellate court has not reversed a lower court decision which may influence the applicability or influence of a given quote. All quotes have been selected based on the subjective evaluations undertaken by the ILC meaning that quotes provided here may not accurately or comprehensively represent a given court’s opinion or conclusion, as such quotes may have originally appeared alongside other negative opinions or accompanying facts. Further, some quotes are derived from unofficial English translations, which may alter their original meaning. We emphasize the need to review the original decision and related decisions before authoritatively relying on quotes. Using quotes provided here should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter in any jurisdiction. Please see the full limitations at https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/about.
The petitioner was arrested for possessing packets of “Cool Lip,” a tobacco pouch or snus consumed by placing the pouch between the cheek and the gum. The petitioner filed for a bail plea to be released from custody and the Madras High Court issued this order in response.
The Court found that there was a sudden increase in children using Cool Lip and it has a debilitating effect on children’s health and behavior. Further, although the product is banned in Tamil Nadu, it was being smuggled in from bordering states.
To advance public health and protect children, the Court issued detailed instructions to the State and Central Governments, including: