Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly, Attorney General of Mass.

Tobacco manufacturers and retailers challenged the constitutionality of regulations promulgated by the Massachusetts Attorney General (AG) that restricted the advertising and sale of tobacco products in an effort to eliminate deceptive advertising and to address and prevent tobacco use by minors.  The Court held that the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act preempted the regulations pertaining to outdoor and point-of-sale advertising of cigarettes.  The Court further held that the AG's regulations pertaining to outdoor and point-of-sale advertising of smokeless tobacco and cigars violated free speech protections because they were not sufficiently tailored to meet the government's asserted interest.  However, the Court upheld the constitutionality of the AG's restrictions on the placement of tobacco products within retail establishments, finding that these comported with free speech principles.

DOWNLOAD DOCUMENT

Lorillard Tobacco Co., et al. v. Reilly, Attorney General of Massachusetts, et al., 533 U.S. 525, 121 S. Ct. 2404, Supreme Court of the United States (2001).

  • United States
  • Jun 28, 2001
  • Supreme Court of the United States

Parties

Plaintiff

  • Lorillard Tobacco Co.
  • Others

Defendant

  • Others
  • Reilly, Attorney General of Massachusetts

Legislation Cited

Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act (as amended), 15 USC §§ 1331 - 1341

940 Code of Massachusetts Regulations, Sections 21.01-21.07, 22.01-22.09 (2000)

Related Documents

Type of Litigation

Tobacco Control Topics

Substantive Issues

Type of Tobacco Product

None